Howard County Maryland Blog

Local Politics and Current Events

Archive for April 10th, 2006

HFStival Migrates To Merriweather – Security

Posted by David Keelan on Monday, April 10, 2006

Although I won't be attending, I have attended previous HFStival's. This is a boon for Merriweather. It is also a boon for the County in terms of sales tax and amusement tax revenues.

I can't remember where I heard it, but I heard Merriweather had a lock on the event because their was little competition for the event. Their loss our gain.

However, this strikes me as odd, because I received additional information about how security is going to be provided for the event.

"It will probably be one of the biggest, if not the biggest, event of the summer," said Capt. Merritt Bender, commander of the special operations bureau for the Howard County Police Department. The bureau, working with Merriweather officials and county fire and rescue services, already is deep into the details of staffing, security and traffic management.

It is my understanding that since the Howard County Police Department is not staffed to handle an event like this (nothing wrong with that) they are going to hire Baltimore County Police Officers for the additional resources they need.

SO WHAT? You may ask. This may seem like a non-issue to you, but let me ask this question anyway.

Why doesn't the Howard County Police Department utlize the resources of the Howard County Sheriff's Department? Why outsource security to Baltimore County? Doesn't our own Sheriff's Deputies have the necessary experience and training to provide this extra level of security? We trust them with security at the Courthouse, transporting prisoners, handling domestic violence, issuing warrants, backing up the Police Department Officers in the line of duty, etc.

Aside from that, if our Law Enforcement Officers need assistance with affordable housing couldn't they use the overtime pay too? Why would the HCPD spend our money on extra security on an outside party instead of caring for our own?

Posted in Howard County | 3 Comments »

Dreyers Ice Cream and Town Center

Posted by David Keelan on Monday, April 10, 2006

In a previous post 2007 Capital Budget IV I discussed a particular $25 million item in the capital budget. “What does this have to do with Columbia Town Center?” you might ask. I will get to that.

The Howard County Times did a good job reporting on the capital budget in terms of hitting the hightlights. They have an in the April 6, 2006 edition discussing the very same thing. They answered one of my questions. I am glad to know that Dreyers will contribute $42 million toward the project over the next 30 years. I have no way of knowing how they arrived at that contribution and no way of knowing if it is fair compensation.What escaped my attention was:

The expansion will cost the county … $47 million in 2008, said James Irvin, the director of the county’s Department of Public Works.

Wow. Total expenditures from 2006 – 2008 are $85 million.

What we don’t know is if Dreyers will be here in 30 years and what Nestle S.A.’s plans are for their new business unit they took control of in January 2006. Who can predict that far out?

On to Columbia Town Center

From the Master Plan regarding Water and Sewer

WATER AND SEWER CAPACITY
Water: The Department of Public Works projects that maximum water demand for the proposed development will range from 1,030,000 gallons per day (gpd) to 1,830,000 gpd. DPW has determined that the current water supply is adequate to meet this additional demand; however, the US 29 water pumping station will need upgrading.

Sewer: DPW projects the design peak sewerage flow for the proposed development will range from 2,128,000 gpd to 3,400,000 gpd. DPW already has capital projects underway for both expansion of the Little Patuxent Water Reclamation Plant and for additional capacity for three sewer interceptors within Town Center and the Little Patuxent parallel sewer interceptor from Columbia to the Water Reclamation Plant in Laurel (about 8 miles). DPW will have its consultant study the anticipated additional capacity needed for Downtown.

Water and sewer system improvements will be needed to support the proposed development in Downtown. Water and sewer lines within Downtown will be constructed by developers. System improvements (water pump station, sewer interceptor, and waste water treatment plant expansions) are funded by user revenues paid to the Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund

Someone put it to me this way:

“This is] massive … compared to Dreyers, [the] increases in water and sewer use will blow the entire utility system out of the ground. …the top utility guys … think the TC plans are DOA, because of this overlooked fact. The capital improvments planned for utilities barely take this … expansion into account. Additionally, a study, if it can be done, would take months. The big question is this. Why is DPZ flying on autopilot without checking with DPW to address the feasibility of the whole plan? Another $1/4 million or more down the toliet, literally, due to totally incompetent planning from DPZ. The TC master plan is nothing more than … delusions of granduer passed along to an inept county planning group. One of those “looks great on paper” ideas [but] are impossible to build. If the approach to roads is, ‘We will deal with the traffic issues as they arise.’ so is the approach to sewer and water. That meanthey will take care of the problems after they occur, which is not the kind of planning I want done in my backyard.

Treatment plant upgrades can cost hundreds of millions of dollars and that is only if MDE [Maryland Department of the Enviroment] grants a permit for expansion. There should be no increases in density until the permitting process is well underway. You can’t build the toliets either until the plant upgrade is complete. Just the upgrade and permits could take 5 years. with everything going just right.”

Well this is definately something to keep an eye on, as I don’t believe, based on the comments above and what is described in the budget, that the $85 million in the Little Patuxent improvements will alone solve for the proposed high density in Town Center.

Are we going to end up borrowing another $85 million to accomodate for the Town Center Master Plan? How can a plan that is billed as being “comprehensive” if DPZ isn’t engaging DPW? Granted I am taking the writer at his/her word but knowing this person as I do I trust he/she knows what they are talking about.

Ok, here is my plug for Merdon. He would ensure that these two inter-related departments are jointly planning on issues like this because he has extensive executive and management experience. It would be second nature to a person with his background and he wouldn’t stand for that type of behavior. If we have to drop $85 million in additional improvements at LP and additional expenditures else where in infrastructure improvements lets know now so we can plan.

Posted in Budget, Howard County | 2 Comments »

Feel Good Legislation

Posted by David Keelan on Monday, April 10, 2006

Let us hope our County Council members go beyond feel good legislation to address the issue.

Demos, at the other Howard County Blog, posted an article about Affordable Housing for Howard County civil servants and suggesting it only addresses one aspect of affordable housing in Howard County. More and more people are finding it difficult to find housing in Howard County, I need only point out the Aladdin article that appeared in the Baltimore Sun on Sunday.

What I find most interesting is this quote from the Howard County Times

Ulman's bill, submitted April 3, would create a directory of apartments that offer free or reduced rent to county police officers. The county government would also take a "proactive" approach in encouraging landlords to participate in the program, Ulman said. . . "This isn't a free gift to police," Ulman said. "The communities are benefiting from the added security a police officer with a take-home car brings."

I think it is important to point out that this does nothing for law enforcement officers in the County. I have a friend in Howard County Law Enforcement. He lives in a very nice apartment at a greatly reduced rental fee simply because he is a law enforcement officer.

What Mr. Ulman is proposing already exists. My friend and I discussed this over the weekend and he laughed at the pure politics of Mr. Ulman's proposal. His position is that any law enforcement officer in Howard County already knows where they can go for reduced rent in a very nice apartment and they don't need County Council to waste time on this issue.

Looks good, feels good, is already happening, and Mr. Ulman is just trying to take credit for something that landlords already do – because it makes sense.

If Mr. Ulman really wants to do something regarding affordable housing then tackle the problem of these people, Aladdin residents fear 1-year notice

Posted in Howard County, Ulman | Leave a Comment »