Howard County Maryland Blog

Local Politics and Current Events

Archive for April 7th, 2008

Hilliary – A view from the UK via the Belfast Telegraph.

Posted by Ed C on Monday, April 7, 2008

Hilliary has said she will improve our international relations – well Mark Steel (You couldn’t make it up (unless you’re Hillary, that is)) must have them in a better mood already.

Her response to being caught lying to a military audience, when she invented a story about being under sniper fire in Bosnia, was to say it wasn’t surprising she got some things wrong, seeing how she spoke millions of words every day. What a magnificent idea, that if you say lots of words some of them are bound to be fantastic lies. So if you listen carefully to horse-racing commentators they say things like “And it’s Teddy’s Boy still leading three furlongs out as they come up to the fourth last fence with Nip and Tuck two lengths behind by the way I fought a tiger once, punched it clean out and they’re all safely over.”


And auctioneers say, “Three-fifty, three-sixty, three-seventy, three-seventy man in the hat three-eighty here, my dad invented cornflakes, going once going twice, and magnets, he invented them straight up – gone.”

Because someone who routinely lies like she does, then dismisses it as a consequence of the number of words she says has severe psychological problems. Perhaps her disorder is a result of the sort of politician she is. Like Blair, neither she nor Bill stand for anything – priding themselves in being tied to no “ideology”. So a normal politician might set out with a set of principles, then lie as they compromise and betray them. But a Blair or Clinton is a politician with no purpose but their own standing, like celebrities who are nothing but celebrities. So they say whatever they feel will make them look best to the audience they’re with, regardless of whether it’s true, until they probably don’t know themselves what’s real and what’s not.

Ouch.

(h/t twelve pounds of fury)

Posted in General | Leave a Comment »

The playoff schedule is posted! The playoff schedule is posted!

Posted by Ed C on Monday, April 7, 2008

(If you thought Nathan Johnson was excited about the new phone books, well I’ve been hitting refresh like a squirrel on crack all afternoon waiting for the NHL to publish the playoff schedules – and finally:

(from washingtoncapitals.com)

2008 EASTERN CONFERENCE – PLAYOFF MASTER SCHEDULE
CONFERENCE QUARTERFINALS – ROUND #1

#3 Washington vs. #6 Philadelphia

Fri.,April 11, 2008 7:00 PM Philadelphia at Washington (Flyers 4 – Caps 5)

Sun., April 13, 2008 2:00 PM Philadelphia at Washington (on NBC) (Flyers 2 – Caps 0)

Tues., April 15, 2008 7:00 PM Washington at Philadelphia (Caps 3 – Flyers 6)

Thurs., April 17, 2008 7:00 PM Washington at Philadelphia (Caps 3 - Flyers 4)

Sat., April 19, 2008 1:00 PM Philadelphia at Washington (Flyers 2 – Caps 3)

Mon., April 21, 2008 7:00 PM Washington at Philadelphia (Caps 4 – Flyers 2)

Tues., April 22, 2008 7:00 Philadelphia at Washington (Flyers 3 – Caps 2 O/T)

I really dodged a few Bullets (actually a few Wizards?) with this. In a fit of excitement and most likely fiscal insanity, I signed up for a Capitals playoff ticket plan a few weeks ago. Riding the Metro home after Saturday’s game had sealed the Caps Southeast Title and 3rd seed in the first round, I started to figure out my schedule. The Wizards play Wednesday and if the Caps had started the series on Thursday – well I would have had a ticket for someone. Away games and Pittsburgh, well TiVo can handle that.

Go Caps – at least until you face the Penguins.

Other schedules listed after the jump.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Ed C, General | Leave a Comment »

Beware the brackets – a hidden way to increase county spending?

Posted by Ed C on Monday, April 7, 2008

Buried in Howard County Bill 15-2008 (pdf) are a set of double brackets that may be a back door attempt by Ken Ulman to increase county spending. The introduction seems innocent enough (emphasis added):

AN ACT amending certain definitions; amending the amount and clarifying the enforcement of the mobile home park refuse collection charge; clarifying the fee for the collection of excess refuse; amending the refuse collection charge assistance program to clarify that the Department of Finance shall administer the program and to amend the amount of the credit; making certain technical corrections; and generally related to refuse collection charges in Howard County.

But a closer look at those pesky “certain technical corrections” under Section 20.900:

Section 20.900. Definitions.
(e) Refuse Collection Service: Refuse Collection Service means the collection and disposal by the county of solid waste[[, excluding the separate collection and processing of recyclable materials]].

Currently trash collection and disposal costs are paid with a annual $175 fee paid by Howard County residents, while the the costs associated with recycling are paid from the general fund. If this legislation is adopted as currently written, the costs for both programs will fall under the “trash collection” fee.

So what? We the taxpayer pay for both anyway, what difference does it make what accounting bin the money comes from? Well, according to public works director James M. Irvin (from the Baltimore Sun: Ulman wants recycling costs moved)

The trash fee raised $14 million for this fiscal year, which is close to what the county expects to pay for trash disposal, according to public works director James M. Irvin. Shifting recycling costs to that fund would mean more revenue would be needed to cover costs.

The current costs for collection in the recycling program is $5 million. That cost is offset by $1.4 million in the sale of recycled materials. This “technical correction” will place an additional $3.6 million dollar of costs into the trash collection “account.”

The current county trash disposal contract expires in 2013 and County officials are expecting a large jump in costs. So, when the county looks to increase the $175.00 fee, the total costs are going to appear even higher (about $45 per household)  when the recycling costs and the general trash collection fees are combined.

If this change passes, will Ken Ulman and the County Council reduce the general budget and reduce our taxes to offset this change?  Or, will this become “found money” and spent elsewhere, effectively increasing or tax burden?

Greg Fox (R-District 5) is going to seek such an amendment, but I was unable to find it posted on the County web site.

Posted in Budget, Ed C, Howard County, Taxes, Ulman | Leave a Comment »