Howard County Maryland Blog

Local Politics and Current Events

Congressional Earmarks to Continue?

Posted by David Keelan on Tuesday, November 28, 2006

On the evening of November 8, 1994 I spoke with my brother (as liberal as they come) about the GOP take over of Congress.  He said to me “You got what you wanted.  How do you feel?”  I told him I was cautiously optimistic.  He replied the only difference between a GOP congress and a Democratic Congress is where they spend the money.  What their spending priorities are.  At first I was happy to tell him – you were wrong.  The longer the GOP stayed in power my brother proved to be correct.

Twelve years later the voters sent a get well card to the G.O.P.

“You spent like Drunk Democrats.
But now I’ll bet, you’re sober.
I hope you will learn a lesson during
Your two-year hangover.”

What disappointed me most about the most recent GOP congresses was the pork barrel and earmark spending.  “Bridge to no where anyone.”  Newt Gingrich has been decrying the spending habits of these GOP wannabes for years.

If conservatives wanted the GOP congresses to go crazy spending our money, driving up deficits, and acting like the party in control then we would not have elected them in 1994.  They were more interested in being the party in power rather than reform.  In 2006 the voters said enough is enough and sent them packing.

In my mind it will be years and years before voters ever look at the Republican party as fiscal conservatives.

I spoke with my same brother over Thanksgiving and he asked me again.  How do you feel now that the Democrats are back in control.  I told him I was cautiously optimistic.  Maybe the Democrats will bring some sanity back to spending.

Then I read this…

Even before the Democrats become the majority party in Congress, there are signs that little of importance will change. New York Times reporter David Kirkpatrick recently wrote a front-page story in which he quotes Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-HI) on “earmark reform.” Inouye said, “I don’t see any monumental changes.” Inouye will take the gavel from the current chairman of the defense appropriations subcommittee, Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK). The two have what Kirkpatrick calls an “unusual bipartisan camaraderie while divvying up projects.”

Ok, defense appropriations.  The devil is in the details.  Defense is one of our top priorities – the Consitution says so.  I am willing to wait and see. 

They are not alone. Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) indicates she, too, will jump on the gravy train because “what is good for the goose is good for the gander.” Nice. So much for Democrats’ commitment to reform. Apparently, the only “reform” will be to use their majority status to funnel more of our tax dollars to the pet projects of Democrats.

I don’t claim that these two speak for the majority of Democrats.  I think it is foolish to say that earmarks will disappear, but will Democrats spend with abandon?  However, they should let history be their guide.  They got botted in 1994.  The GOP got the boot this year.  It was about fiscal responsibility then and it will be two years from now.

This is not to say that Iraq and ethics had nothing to do with the results of November 7, 2006.  They were a big part of it.  However, Iraq, ethics, and spending created a perfect storm that swept the GOP out and the Democrats in.  Can the Democrats avoid the same fate?  I think they can if they are fiscally conservative.  If not 2008 will be a very interesting year.


3 Responses to “Congressional Earmarks to Continue?”

  1. bsflag2007 said

    “Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) indicates she, too, will jump on the gravy train because “what is good for the goose is good for the gander.” Nice.”

    I couldn’t agree more…. nice…. I subscribe to the theory that if it is wrong for them it is wrong for us too.

    Is there a pithy little comment for that?


  2. Jim Walsh said

    Earmarks are just one of several reasons why the Republicans lost Congress. Hopefully, the Democrats will quickly fall back into their old ways, and the Republicans will learn their lesson, and the GOP can re-take one or both houses of Congress in 2008. After all, with a 51-49 margin, it only takes a switch of 2 seats (and maybe only 1) for the GOP to retake the Senate.

  3. bsflag2007 said

    IF “the republicans will learn their lesson…”-

    which lesson is that? return to fiscal responsibility or renounce the ultra conservative agenda?

    cindy v

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: