Howard County Maryland Blog

Convention of States in Maryland

The first 10 amendments are the Bill of Rights

Posted by Jim Walsh on Thursday, June 26, 2008

In District of Columbia v. Heller, decided today (6/26/08), the Supreme Court struck down D.C.’s ban on individual ownership of handguns.  In doing so, the Court expressly adopted the view that the Second Amendment grants an individual right to keep and bear arms, as opposed to the “collective right” (relating to a “well-regulated militia’) theory espoused by gun control advocates.

Although I personally own no firearms, and confess that in my college days I contributed $5 to a group called Handgun Control, I have seen the light of the individual rights view, and have long wondered why groups that are usually screaming at the top of their lungs for all sorts of individual rights (usually with no notion of corresponding responsibility) are so inconsistent when it comes to the Second Amendment.

I can never recall the left ever doubting in any other case involving one of the amendments of the Bill of Rights that the Constitution did not grant an individual right.  If the Second Amendment did really involve just a collective right for the states, why was it even necessary?  The left frequently admonishes us, with their usual sanctimony, that we need to live up to the ideals of the Constitution, inconvenient though they may sometimes be.  Why should the Second Amendment be disregarded or regulated so much as to be meaningless?

For anyone who truly loves liberty, and regardless of your personal feelings about firearms, do you really want the government to be able to deny one of your Constitutional rights just because it has become unpopular among certain constituencies?


One Response to “The first 10 amendments are the Bill of Rights”

  1. pzguru said

    Amen. Not only is this a personal rights issue, but there are many studies that show that in areas where citizens are armed, are even allowed to be armed, there is less crime.

    What’s really sad about the “left’s” argument and constant attempts to outlaw guns completely, is they really think that this will make cities safer. What they don’t want to acknowledge is that criminals don’t obey laws so even if guns are banned, the criminals will still find a way to get them, and then the rest of the law abiding citizens will be defenseless. Brilliant!

    Even Barack Obama is now claiming to support gun ownership rights, even though he supported the DC gun ban last year. Nice election year flip flop.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: